Unless we are possessed of an unusual degree of self-awareness we shall never see through our projections but must always succumb to them, because the mind in its natural state presupposes the existence of such projections. It is the natural and given thing for unconscious contents to be projected. In a comparatively primitive person this creates that characteristic relationship to the object that Levy-Bruhl has fittingly called "mystic identity", or "participation mistique". Thus every normal person of our time who is not reflective beyond the average, is bound to his environment by a whole system of projections
(Jung, CW 8, par 507)
Showing posts with label jung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jung. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 5, 2008
Monday, July 28, 2008
Just as Jung called complexes splinter personalities, so one may call symptoms and complexes splinter, or fractile, mythologies. Each has a core energic structure, each has valence, each has an identity, each has a fractionated agenda. When evoked, each has a tendency toward the repetition compulsion, and yet each is an opening to the dynamics of pathology and a clue to the healing agenda obliged. Again, how can depth psychology be performed without a knowledge of the essential mythopoetic process of psyche?
James Hollis (Is Something Mything)
James Hollis (Is Something Mything)
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Just as we tend to assume that the world is as we see it, we naively suppose that people are as we imagine them to be. In this latter case, unfortunately, there is no scientific test that would prove the discrepancy between perception and reality. Although the possibility of gross deception is infinitely greater here than in our perception of the physical world, we still go on naively projecting our own psychology into our fellow human beings. In this way everyone creates for himself a series of more or less imaginary relationships based entirely on projection.
(Jung, CW 8, par 507)
(Jung, CW 8, par 507)
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
"But why on earth," you may ask, "should it be necesarry for man to achieve, by hook or by crook, a higher level of consciousness?" This is truly the crucial question, and I do not find the answer easy. Instead of the real answer I can only make a confession of faith: I believe that, after thousands and millions of years, someone had to realize that this wonderful world of mountains and oceans, suns and moons, galaxies and nebulae, plants and animals exists. From a low hill on the plains of East Africa I once watched the vast herds of wild animals grazing in soundless stillness, as they had from time immemorial, touched only by the breath of a primeval world. I felt then as if I were the first man, the first creature, to know that all this, is. The entire world around me was still in a primeval state; it did not know that it was. And then, in that one moment in which I came to know, the world sprang into being; without that moment it would never have been. All nature seeks this goal and finds it fulfilled in man. ...Every advance, even the smallest, along this path of conscious realization adds that much to the world.
(Jung, 9-1 CW, par 177)
(Jung, 9-1 CW, par 177)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)